Debate Response (10/3/2012)

The debate held on October 3rd, 2012 between the two main presidential candidates at the University of Denver emphasized the important differences between Romney and Obama. Despite my personal tiffs with either of the candidates' beliefs, basing my thoughts solely on the discussion at hand, it is obvious to me that Romney won the debate for a few vital reasons. One reason I found him to be more persuasive than Obama was that he would address every charge put against him, explaining, in full, his plans for America. For example, even though it causes him to have to interrupt Lehrer, he makes sure to emphasize how important it is to him that people know that he is "not in favor of a $5 trillion tax cut" and that it was never part of his plan. Many people may have found this rude, but on its own, I think it's a very convincing strategy to get American citizens to know his true motives, as well as lets them know that he is willing to do what he has to in order to assert himself in a situation. (I know, personally, I would want an assertive president, rather than a passive one who wants to please everyone.) I also think that Obama also fell hard during this debate. He seemed very unattached throughout the debate. I also noted both of their use of facts and evidence supporting their beliefs and view points, strengthening either of their arguments. Although President Obama was more respectful, Romney came to the floor with confidence rather than arrogance, and left with a bang, leaving Americans with a great source of emotional appeal: "I will not cut our commitment to our military. I will keep America strong and get America's middle class working again."